Roof Trusses Vs Conventional Framing

Roof framing is one of the most challenging task.

Roof trusses vs conventional framing.

Also in a structure with exposed roof framing trusses produce a manufactured appearance that may be undesirable. However this doesn t look quite sturdy or safe. If any last minute changes are made to how things look it can simply be changed one piece at a time. Roof framing has undergone a quiet revolution over the past half century.

The roof and ceiling can be attached to the same member. Trusses are gradually replacing the conventional rafters to the point that nowadays more than 80 percent of new residential construction uses trusses to support the roof. As you can see circled in red on the left is a bunch of boards or sticks connected together to support the frame of the roof. A stick framed roof is made up of individual rafters and that are connected to a top beam.

This disadvantage can be significant for larger structures in which conventional framing would provide a large usable attic. Most types of trusses eliminate your attic space. Additional boards are placed horizontally on the frames to create a complete cover for the structure. Ing where floor and roof trusses are used and accommodates 24 inch spacing of studs where wind loads permit or where larger studs are required for thicker in.

This first image is from a roof project being constructed using the stick frame technique. Let s go through a few lists of pros and cons of both stick framing and trusses to begin. Example what stick framing looks like compared to trusses.